Number of deaths is utterly irrelevant if you can't figure out how many. I could say that nuclear explosions that have gone off in the US are less deadly, since nobody got hit by one in the US, while I could say sleeping in the UK is very deadly since many people die during it.Having the actual percent rates are a lot better, because if nearly nine hundred people died from ecstasy like they said, and only 5/10/25 thousand people used it, that's a pretty damn high chance of dying. But if a million people participated in horseback riding and 900 people died, that's still too many deaths, but it's statistically less dangerous.Hell, if I started only using the data I wanted, ignored the rest, and forgot about "math", I'd sure-as-hell get offered a job at MSNBC.