Posted: 10 17 2009 Post subject: britney spears video pictures
I thought it was built by incredibly motivated entrepreneurs, who had an idea developed a business plan risked their own capital as well as finding other people willing to risk capital as investors. Thus creating companies that employed tens of thousands of skilled and unskilled workers for decades.
Posted: 10 16 2009 Post subject: brooke burke naked
I wouldn't get too optimistic about this one. The Droid commercials are bashing the iPhone pretty hard. I think it's safe to say that all is not well between Apple and Verizon, as much as I would love for them to get along. I wouldn't be surprised if they are working with another carrier/radio technology for the iPad/iSlate that they are working on.
The amount of coverage of the deaths because of different drugs, vs the amount of actual deaths.They're probably counting mentions of an intoxicated driver being high or someone smoking pot before committing a crime.
Posted: 10 14 2009 Post subject: Online casinos free play
Dugg for Bridget. Also, yeah, what's with the ad? It hurts my eyes..
Ah so close... oh so close... I have to give this to you... See what you propose is really how things should be. Building a solid infrastructure really does create the best long term stability. That is why we could rebuild the world after WWI and WWII. We had our ducks lined up in a row were able to exploit that for 30 years after the fact. Not only did we build our own things but we were able to do so for everyone else. In fact modern Europe, Japan and even China would not have existed if it were not for us and our ability to create things. However in that time something happened. A big component was that in rebuilding the rest of the world our relative power declined. Right after WWII if we wanted to we could have made western Europe a 51st state if we wanted to. The only people left with the balls to put up a fight were the Russians but with out our industrial help and our nukes Stalin would have bled the Soviet Union white in the process. In any case since our relative industrial power declined so did our economic power. However this is still a good scenerio for us as this allows us to be in a fairly steady state economy where we have low (anything more then the population growth rate is unsustainable) but constant economic growth. However what happened was that many people were not satisfied with this and insisted that higher growth rates could be attained if we just broadened our markets more. So globalization took off and our economy was not forced to deal with the build up of the whole world. The problem here is that our relative wealth isn't anywhere near where it was after WWII. The US economy can't build the rest of the world without going bankrupt in the process. So here we are. We can't get the whole world to where we are. There is not enough material in the world to allow almost 7 billion people to live a western lifestyle. So as a consequence we are being dragged down to their level since we have in effect equalized our markets to each other. In this new global market labor is dirt cheap but commodity costs are much higher. The end result is that even if you wanted to you can't make a strong economy from the ground up anymore. There is too much labor competing for too few resources to make it sustainable. You build but then there is not enough feedback to justify the maintainence of those jobs.!
I think he stated his point very clearly. I'll recap:a. this was pure jihadb. committed by an American c. on American soil d. against are troops.Draw your own conclusions.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum